اثر اعتماد و عدالت بر طفره رفتن اجتماعی با استفاده از متغیر میانجی تعهد سازمانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم وتحقیقات

چکیده

ازجمله عوامل کاهش کارایی در گروه های کاری، طفره رفتن و از زیر کار در رفتن است. طفره رفتن
اجتماعی به پدیده ای اطلاق می شود که در آن تلاش افراد در هنگام انجام کار گروهی کاهش می یابد.
عوامل متعددی در ایجاد این پدیده موثر هستند. بنابراین هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تاثیر عدالت
و اعتماد بر طفره رفتن اجتماعی است. این پژوهش توصیفی و از نوع پیمایشی است و ازلحاظ هدف
کاربردی است و ابزار جمع آوری اطلاعات پرسشنامه است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، دانشجویان دکتری
دانشگاه کاشان به تعداد 441 نفر هستند که 226 نفر به صورت تصادفی ساده به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند.
به منظور آزمون فرضیه ها، از مدل معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان می دهد که وجود
اعتماد و عدالت

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Trust and Justice On Social Involvement Using the Mediating Variable of Organizational Commitment

نویسنده [English]

  • somayeh zeraatkar
Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
چکیده [English]

Among the factors that reduce the efficiency of working groups is a matter of eluding. Social eluding refers to a phenomenon in which the effort of individuals decreases when doing group work. Several factors contribute to this phenomenon. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of justice and trust on social eluding. This is descriptive and survey research. It is practical in terms of purpose and questionnaire was used as a tool for collecting data from. The statistical population of the study was 448 students of Kashan University of Medical Sciences. 220 students were selected randomly. In order to test the hypotheses, a structural equation model was used. The results of the research show that the existence of trust and justice in working groups leads to the reduction of social eluding through the mediating variable of commitment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social eluding
  • Trust
  • Justice and Commitment
  1. مرتضوی، سعید؛ حکیمی، حسن. سودی، نعمت الله. (1390). بررسی تاثیر ادراک از عدالت و اعتماد بر طفره رفتن اجتماعی تیم ها در تسهیم دانش؛ پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی؛ سال سوم، شماره 5.
  2. Alnuaimi, O. A., Robert, L. P., & Maruping, L. M. (2010). Team size, dispersion, and social loafing in technology supported teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), pp: 203-230.
  3. Anshel, M. H. (1993). Examining social loafing among elite female rowers as a function of task duration and mood. Journal of Sport Behavior.
  4. Blaskovich, J. L. (2008). Exploring the effect of distance: an experimental investigation of virtual collaboration, social loafing, and group decisions. Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 27-46.
  5. Chidambaram, L. & Tung, L. L. (2005). Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology supported groups. Information Systems Research, 16(2), 149-168.
  6. Dick, R. V., Tissington, P. A., &Hertel, G. (2009). Do many hands make light work? How to overcome social loafing and gain motivation in work teams. European Business Review, 21(3), 233-245.
  7. Elsaid, M. K. (2005). The effects of group beliefs and task meaningfulness on social loafing. Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
  8. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681- 706.
  9. Kugihara, N. (1999). Gender and social loafing in Japan. Journal of Social Psychology, 139(4), 516-526.
  10. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A., & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: a field investigation. Journal of Management, 30(2), 285-304.
  11. Lin, T. C.,& Huang, C. C. (2009). Understanding social loafing in knowledge contribution from the perspectives of justice and trust. Expert Systems with Application, 36, 6156-6163.
  12. ‏ Marjani, A. B. & Ardahaey, F. T. (2012), The relationship between organizational structure and organizational justice, Asian Social Science, vol. 8, No. 4.
  13. Mccormic, M. D. (2001). Group cohesiveness and coworker ability as determinants of social loafing and social compensation.Austin State University.
  14. Murphy, S. M., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., &Erdogan, B. (2003).Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human  Relations, 56(1), 61–84.
  15. Podsakoff, P., Mackenzie, S., Paine, J. and Bachrach, D. (2000), “Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for further research”, Journal of Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 513-63.
  16. Simms, A. & Nichols, T. (2014). Social loafing: a review of literature. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 15 (1), pp:58-67.
  17. Stark, E. M., Shaw, J. D., & Duffy, M. K. (2007). Preference for group work, winning orientation, and social loafing behavior in groups. Group & Organization Management, 32(6), 699-723.
  18. Suleiman, J., &Watsom, R. T. (2008). Social loafing in technology-supported teams. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17, 291-309.
  19. Schappe,S.P.(1998)," The influence of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and fairness perceptions on organizational citizenship behavior" ,Journal Of Psychology,Vol.132,No.3,pg.277
  20. Tan, H. H., & Tan, M. L. (2008). Organizational citizenship behavior and social loafing: the role of personality, motives, and contextual factors. Journal of Psychology, 142(1), 89-108.
  21. Ulke, H, E,. & Bilgic R. (2011). Investigating the role of the big five on the social loafing of information technology workers, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(3), 301-312.